Then, you can get the code from your repository in one of several ways:
<> Code
button; you can click on that and choose “Open with Github Desktop”To test it out, try cloning your lab reports repository. You’ll see a message about cloning, and then see this page:
In this screenshot, you’ll see the red circled part where it says Open in Visual Studio Code
, which is where you can open your code in VS Code to edit your files directly! One thing that I often find a little surprising about this page is that it doesn’t list any files – index.md
is nowhere to be found here! This is because Github Desktop (and the underlying tool, git
) are all about tracking and recording changes; we won’t see much in this interface until we make some edits or create some new files.
Today in lab, you’ll clone another repository and work with it a bit, so you’ll see how this works.
Make a fork of this repository (it’s OK if it’s public):
https://github.com/ucsd-cse15l-f23/lab3
The fork button is on the upper right:
This makes a copy of the repository on in your Github account. Then, clone the repository that you forked (not the original!) using Github Desktop, and open it in Visual Studio Code.
There are a few relevant files for us:
ArrayExamples.java
ArrayTests.java
ListExamples.java
LinkedListExample.java
FileExample.java
The files that end in Example
or Examples
have code in them with bugs for you to find – in ListExamples
and ArrayExamples
, all the methods have bugs.
LinkedListExample
at least one of the methods on LinkedList
has a bug.FileExample
, getFiles
has a bug.So many 🐛s!
The file ArrayTests.java
has some tests for the methods in ArrayExamples.java
. It uses a library called JUnit to run tests using methods called assertEquals
and assertArrayEquals
and other assert...
methods. (Note: JUnit is already included in the repository so no need to install anything)
When we run this class with JUnit, it runs each method that has a @Test
annotation on it, and reports the success or failure of the assert
calls.
Since JUnit is an external library, it requires some extra work to compile and run. These two commands work well, and you should see output like the below when you run them:
MAC USERS:
local $ javac -cp .:lib/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar:lib/junit-4.13.2.jar *.java
local $ java -cp .:lib/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar:lib/junit-4.13.2.jar org.junit.runner.JUnitCore ArrayTests
JUnit version 4.13.2
..
Time: 0.006
OK (2 tests)
WINDOWS USERS:
local $ javac -cp ".;lib/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar;lib/junit-4.13.2.jar" *.java
local $ java -cp ".;lib/junit-4.13.2.jar;lib/hamcrest-core-1.3.jar" org.junit.runner.JUnitCore ArrayTests
..
Time: 0.006
OK (2 tests)
*
in the first command tells javac
to compile all the .java
files in this directory. It’s a shorthand for writing them all out, so it’s a useful notation to start using now whenever we have several Java files to compile.-cp
command-line argument stands for “classpath”. Java uses this command-line argument to know where to look for classes. It takes paths separated by :
/ ;
(dependent on your operating system), so the first place it will look is .
, the current directory. After that, it will look for classes in the two .jar
files in the lib
directory. A .jar
file is like a .zip
file of a bunch of classes, and Java knows how to work with them...
in the output below JUnit
has something to do with a path, it’s actually printing a .
for each test that runs. So if you run hundreds of tests, you can kinda watch the progress by seeing how the dots count up.Task with your group: Try running the command of the operating system that isn’t yours. (For example, a MAC user trying the Windows command and vise-versa) Observe the output and discuss with your partner/group what happens and why?
The two tests we wrote for you in ArrayTests.java
pass, but the two implementations of reverse methods in ArrayExamples.java
have bugs! Write more tests in ArrayTests.java
to demonstrate that the two methods, reverseInPlace
and reversed
, have bugs, and identify the bugs.
Write down in notes - For each, what was the failure-inducing input (the test)? What was the symptom (the output when the test failed)? What was the bug (the problem in the code)? Be as specific as possible when adding the following down to your notes:
Checkpoint – After fixing the reverse methods, we want to save these changes to our Github repo. It’s really useful to checkpoint your work this way; you will be able to see in the commit history every time you make a change and commit.
In order for these changes to appear on GitHub, we need to commit and push them. Open your GitHub Desktop window, and it should show that you have made a change in the lab3
respository as seen in the image below (which shows the wavelet
repo but it should look similar). Click the button shown at the bottom left that says Commit to main
.
Next, for the changes to actually appear on GitHub, you need to push them. GitHub Desktop should now display a new screen. Click the Push origin
button displayed in the screenshot below.
Now your changes to this repository should be visible in GitHub!
You can see more documentation about git and pushing your changes here:
Next, for averageWithoutLowest
, you will do a similar process as above, making sure to note symptoms, failure-inducing inputs, and bugs. But, this time, your lab partner will brainstorm one of the tests for you to write, describe it to you at a high level, and then you will implement it. Complete these steps as described below.
If you’re having trouble thinking of tests, try starting from the smallest possible inputs (an empty array), and then trying increasing sizes of arrays to structure your thinking.
There are two methods in ListExamples
, each of which has a bug. For this program, create a new file called ListTests.java
with JUnit tests. In ListTests.java
, write some tests to identify and demonstrate the bugs in ListExamples
. You should carefully design your tests to get failing inputs, symptoms, and eventually identify the bugs. Keep in mind that most of the time we can find relatively small inputs that trigger the symptom!
Hint – if you’re not sure about Java interfaces, there is review material, and an online textbook with examples (free, you have to make an account).
Write down in notes – Symptoms, inputs, and bugs.
Checkpoint – Commit and push your changes, and don’t forget to add the new file! This is one of the most common mistakes I make with git
that is annoying for my collaborators: I add a new file locally and forget to put it on Github for them to see!
The file LinkedListExample.java
has an implementation of a linked list that is, in fact, buggy. We won’t tell you which method(s) have the bugs. Create a file called LinkedListTests.java
and write tests in that file.
Note that for this case, your failure-inducing input requires a little more work to construct: you have to build lists and try out the methods. All of that work is part of the “failure-inducing input”, and it’s useful to have it all written down in code so that we don’t have to remember it or re-type it each time we want to run the test.
Write down in notes – Symptoms, inputs, and bugs.
Checkpoint – Commit and push your changes, and don’t forget to add the new file! This is one of the most common mistakes I make with git
that is annoying for my collaborators: I add a new file locally and forget to put it on Github for them to see! This is repeated from last week.
Reflect, write down in notes – You’ve now had to create two new test files (one for ListExamples
and one for LinkedListExample
). What actions did you take in your editor to do this? How long did it take you? Could you or did you use copy/paste effectively to avoid lots of typing? Could you or did you use the up arrow in the terminal to “get back” earlier commands rather than typing them out again? Any other tricks you could use to make this more painless in the future?
Discuss with your group! The long-term goal here is to learn tips and tricks to take tasks that might be annoying 5-minute tasks and turn them into 30-second tasks. It really changes how you think about writing tests if the process of getting started takes less time!
The file FileExample.java
has an implementation of a method that works with the filesystem and, fortunately for our learning, it’s buggy.
This one is interesting because the definition of a “failure-inducing input” is trickier – this program won’t run without us having some files and paths available to try! There is a comment in FileExample.java
showing an example file structure for this program. So the first thing you may want to do is create the file structure depicted in the comment in your repository! Then you can write tests that use FileExample.java
. You can create this just using VScode’s “new file” and “new folder” buttons/options.
To help you read and understand the program check out the File
documentation here:
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/io/File.html
Write down in notes – Symptoms, inputs, and bugs. Remember that your input is not just the code, but also the test files you created.
Checkpoint – Commit and push your changes, and don’t forget to add the new files, including the files you created as test input! All these files need to be a part of the repository so that we can run the tests. (This is a particularly annoying one to realize you missed later – the test will fail because the input data doesn’t exist!)
Discuss – Out of all the bugs above, which was the most interesting bug you found? Have you ever made bugs like these yourself in your own programs? What about having JUnit tests written might be useful one or two weeks from now?
Let’s test your knowledge of bugs and how to troubleshoot them!
You and your partner should design a bug that you think is not trivial to catch. Make sure you agree on what a failure-inducing input for it is. This could be a new method you make up, or an edit to one of the existing methods in the lab already.
Write down in notes - Then, with another pair who has also done this, swap the buggy programs you designed (you can copy-paste them into the notes doc to share). See if you can spot one another’s bugs, and catch them with a well-designed input. Were these easy or hard to catch?
Once both groups have found the issues, try again! Try to stump one another with plausible, but tough-to-find, bugs.
Share your favorites with your team and tutor. We’ll share a few of the best ones in class.